Oneness University, Amma and Bhagavan, Psychology of Vision, and Facebook

Psychology of Vision was once a franchise of Oneness University, having been "authorized" to bestow "Deeksha Blessings" at the end of 2009. Chuck and Lency spent 21 days at OU in India in 2007, humbled at the feet of Amma and Bhagavan and guided by Raksith Ji.

But something happened, a serpent entered Eden and POV attempted to erase all trace of  their allegiance with OU in early 2014. Most of the "Cards of the Day" praising Amma and Bhagavan  were deleted, the statement that OU was one of their two (along with ACIM) "greatest inspirations" were chopped out of POV webpages, Chuck's LinkedIn wiped away his attendance at OU.

So what happened?

We have two statements from the POV side regarding this:

"What Is The Nature of The Relationship Between Psychology of Vision And Oneness University?

There is no relationship between the two organizations. Some of us attended healing programs there years ago, but for a number of reasons it felt true to me to distance Psychology of Vision from Oneness U. For about a year after making that decision, I stated in my seminars that I did not recommend that people attend their programs."
--Lency Spezzano

"My parents also have NO affiliation whatsoever with Oneness University. They and some of their students attended some of their courses a number of years ago, but were shocked and disgusted to learn about some of their practices. My mom actually spearheaded a campaign to learn and expose the truth about Oneness University. My parents do not support their practices, community, or methods. They have wanted nothing to do with that organization once they had an opportunity to learn more about them. They adamantly steer people away from that organization, their practices, and beliefs. They would NOT want their students to be affiliated with that organization in any capacity."
--Christopher Spezzano

We have never found any online record of the Spezzanos campaigning against Amma, Bhagavan, or Oneness University prior to 2014. As one of our fellow critics has observed, it must have been a "stealth campaign."

As some randomly found Facebook entries below illustrate, Lency and Christopher's above statements are misleading at best, to put it charitably. So what's the deal here?